I have left WA some time ago, after I got silence banned lol. To be totally honest as well: their hosting and site support was bad, very bad, in the first place. Since I have switched to wpx.net, I have no more downtimes , no more 'dangerous site' - issues at all. What a relief!

Even when I have an issue with a plugin or something, they help me out like almost straight away. On WA, that kind of support was non -excisting. On the contrary, they decided what you could use on your site and what not (even if you bloody payed for a plugin), without even warning you, and you had to beg them to make 'an exception'. That's where i've had enough.

I'd have to check, because I'm paying yearly now, but I think it is about 30 $ per month now. (2 sites and 1 subdomain)

I've read that their site support is now AI driven? I would think that would make it even harder to switch, ugh.

Anyway, there is already a free chat on wpx.net that you can talk to, without even having subscribed to them. They are very helpful, and I'm sure they will help you out with your questions! 

( WA will be very hesitant to help you switch hosting, so you really need to insist about it, OR make NOISE in the community if their support doesnt help you, you have nothing to lose as you are leaving anyway!) They will ask you why you would need those codes etc blablabla, unless they have changed their attitudes by now. It was very bad towards me.

It's good to see that I havent missed anything there anymore, glad I'm gone there. I made a new free account a few months ago, and Kyles newsletter don't mean a thing, apparently they made their own 'image creator', hahahahahaha. 

Good luck,
Lizzy

Even though I pay the $299/year Black Friday rate, I just don’t use WA anymore, and I no longer find real value in the training.

One of the things I do want to do is transfer my domains out of WA. I’d love to hear from people here:

• What was your experience transferring domains away from WA?

• Which registrar/provider did you use — and would you recommend them?

• Any warnings, tips, or pitfalls I should be aware of (authorization codes, domain lock, renewal costs, etc.)?

Thanks in advance for any advice or personal experiences.

Mike

So, I had an email from Clickbank this morning flogging a course on the importance of good headlines. The email provided some clues as to how to write the best affiliate headlines (according to Clickbank - they should know, lol). 

I immediately thought of Chatty and pasted the email into the chat, asking my mate to create a 'perfect headline' generator ... essentially reverse engineer the email and fill in the blanks.

Here's what it came up with ... see how you get on!

✅ Final Headline-Generator Prompt (with Web Search + No Fabrication)

Act as a senior performance copywriter and a cautious researcher.
Your job is to produce 7 unique, non-formulaic, high-converting headlines, but only after gathering accurate information.

🔹 Workflow

Step 1 — Ask for one thing only:
“Please provide the product or service name.”

Step 2 — Perform a brief web search using that name to gather:

• Target audience

• Main benefit or main problem it solves

• Distinguishing features or positioning

🔹 Critical Rule (No Fabrication)

If the web search returns no clear, verifiable information about any of these items, you must stop immediately and say:

“I couldn’t find enough reliable information.
Please provide the target audience, main benefit/problem solved, preferred tone, and platform manually.”

You must not infer, assume, or invent details.

Step 3 — If information is found

Present the findings back to me in a short list and ask for confirmation or edits:

“Here’s what I found based on the web search—please confirm or refine:
• Target audience: …
• Core benefit/problem solved: …
• Distinguishing features: …
Also confirm your preferred tone and platform.”

Step 4 — After confirmation

Generate 7 original headlines that follow these rules:

• Speak directly to the audience

• Avoid clickbait and exaggerated claims

• Use clear specificity

• Use numbers only when they naturally fit

• Keep length scroll-stopping but not truncated

• Optional bracketed context (e.g., , )

• Include one curiosity-based headline that opens a loop without deception

• Each headline must use a different style (benefit-driven, emotional, question, contrarian, data-driven, short punchy, bracket-boosted)

• No templates, no repetitive structures, no detectable patterns

Someone on Reddit said it best ... these tools are basically taking Google search volume, running it through a secret 'AI multiplier' and calling it insight. Until OpenAI or Google start publishing query logs, I’m treating those numbers like horoscope readings  - entertaining, but not really worth the bits and bytes they consume.

Here’s what I don’t get - where are they getting the numbers from?

As far as I know, OpenAI, Perplexity, Claude, and Google’s AI Overviews don’t release any kind of public query data. Are they just pulling from Google keyword volume and applying some kind of formula?

My gut tells me not to trust these tools. Anyone know how reliable (or totally made up) these “AI volume” metrics might be?

If it’s all predictive, does it even matter? Or should we be focusing more on whether our content shows up in AI answers, not how often people ask the AI?

Spending any time investigating this stuff makes my brain hurt 🤯

The front-end stuff’s not bad for seventeen bucks - Dave’s been around for donkey’s years in the “info-product” scene, so it’s not pure scammy fluff. That said, as Diane mentioned, the real machine he talks about depends on pricey video tools which most beginners won’t touch without wincing.

The underlying idea (faceless AI-driven channels) can work, but it's certainly not hands-off. You will need to treat it like any other content system: you still need solid topics, thumbnails, retention, consistency and a bit of patience. The “invisible” bit just means you’re automating the on-camera work, not dodging all the hard graft.

As far as cheaper (but still high quality) video tools go, I'd highly recommend HeyGen Avatar IV (paid link). I think it's $40 a month or thereabouts for the higher tier plan that gives you plenty of flexibility. That’ll let you test the concept without the $249 monthly gut-punch.

So yep give it a punt if you’re curious, but think of it as a YouTube practice kit rather than a business in a box.

(And keep your tea and biscuit fund intact till it actually brings you some views 😉)

I created the video below with HeyGen without using any brain power at all. You could do a lot more with a little thoughtful input ...

(the HeyGen link in this post is an affiliate link and I may receive a small commission should you decide to buy through my link. There is no extra cost to you and it helps the universal energy remain in alignment ... he he ... thank you for your support)

I have "acquired" this course

I'm intrigued Diane but I'm not sure I want to know :-)

I definitely can't afford $249.99 per month so that's out but maybe there's an alternative to Flow for AI video generation? Something cheaper but still high quality enough to do the business.

I'll have a search but if anyone has a recommendation I'm all ears!

(don't ask how, lol)

How?

{blue}:laugh: