Okay, here goes...
At this moment in time in order to rank on the first page of Google for a LOT of keywords and topics you're coming up across high Domain Authority.
Simply put, if there's a load of High DA websites in the top 10 results, you're NOT going to rank.
However, something that I have been talking about for a while now is to take advantage of "parasite SEO" on websites that are "web 2.0 properties" (websites that allow users to add content).
Sure, we have the "site reputation abuse" Google update on Sunday, May 5th, but I honestly don't think this is going to impact the "social", "forum", and "user-generated websites", I think it's mainly going to affect websites that have blatantly advertised, "write us a guest post", "sponsored posts available", etc.
Anyway, when looking at the SERPs for the keyword
Wealthy Affiliate Review
It is mainly UGC and parasite SEO that is ranking.
Nyall's negative WA review from 4 years ago still ranks at the top, but now it's his Reddit post, whereas his website post ranks in Position 7 (I LIKE Nyall, judge me all you like!! LOL).
However, there are TWO web 2.0 UGC content platforms ranking in THREE places on page one for the keyword - Wealthy Affiliate Review
Medium = position 3
Linkedin = position 6 and position 9
This is Google literally telling you, "A Wealthy Affiliate review written on Medium or Linkedin WILL rank on page one" (will it last forever? Who Knows, but if this is what is currently ranking, TAKE ADVANTAGE OF IT).
So, you will need to rewrite your Wealthy Affiliate Review TWICE.
A summary of around 800-1,200 words is FINE.
You then add one review to Medium and the other review to Linkedin.
You then COME BACK to this PAGE with your article links and we will ALL provide "social signals" for your reviews (likes, upvotes, comments)
Admittedly, WA member Tony Omary, has 307 "claps" on his review on Medium (we don't have enough people here to do that yet, LOL), but Medium seems to rank well WITHOUT social signals (just share the article to your socials).
However, the Linkedin review in position 6 only has 8 "reactions" and the Linkedin review in position 9 has 2 "reactions", we can definitely beat that!!
So, which one of you is going to be first?
Will you end up competing with each other?
Hahahahahahahahahaha!!
(and don't bother with YouTube for that keyword, Eric Cantu completely owns it).
So, once more, rewrite your WA review in around 800-1,200 words TWICE.
Publish to Medium, publish to Linkedin, add article links HERE, and we will all "like", "upvote", and "comment" and GET YOU ON PAGE ONE OF GOOGLE FOR THE KEYWORD
WEALTHY AFFILIATE REVIEW
Go for it!!
Partha
Great advice Partha - I hadn't even tried to reach Page 1. I was just using the WA review as an internal link from helpful/informational posts. It didn't seem possible to get to Page 1 - but now it is!
Cheers, Alisa
Now, thàt type of tricks was missing at the WA community,cheeky hahahahahaha!
And, googled that keyword as well here from Belgium, and indeed those two were always in front, nobody ever mentioned this on WA, which I thought was weird.
Lizzy
(Dare I ask this question...) Does it have to be a positive review? I wish I had more time in my life... LOL.
Just a quick note Partha: claps on Medium are similar to likes in principle, but one person can leave as many claps as they wish. It's very possible that the 307 claps you're referring to were done by only 5 people or even fewer.
I started writing on Medium a few months ago, and I found that one person leaving 50 claps on an article is quite typical, although there are those who play "hard to get" and only leave one clap.
You don't even have to click multiple times — just press and hold, and the clap counter goes up!
So the question here is, how does Google perceive Medium claps in terms of engagement? I don't know, but it wouldn't make sense to treat 1 clap as 1 like.