@diane that is weird Diane!

So far, my impressions have dropped another 50% ... which I didn't think was even possible seeing as they're so low anyway 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 

@diane I was watching this video about brand-new research of all this chancing.
I want to stress that I don´t know how reliable the research is, and the same goes for the video channel (I have seen videos from it many times but am still not sure!).

But as I felt that it contained many points to consider, I decided to set it here. There is one point to have in mind, too, that they don´t mention. If my feeling is correct, they are more researched big sites, which I think are very different topics than smaller sites that probably most of us have.

But there are interesting points, like fewer posts but with more quality getting up, as Diane and Partha had talked about. I think that is one point about the difference between big and small. >
Because bigger can let a big percentage go and still have a lot of posts, while smaller can be like a Sahara after that.

I tried to set it as a private page in October because I wanted to keep some, but I don´t have a clue if that was right.
The only change was that it showed a failure in Linkwhisper, which took public and private links equally and showed bad service when I asked them about it.

Too, as I understand it, but it could be a language misunderstanding. The ideology of the man from Turkey—sorry, I don´t remember his name—about writing many posts about questions for a selected topic could not be accepted. I understand it that way, as they talk about merging the same. But like I said, it is quite possible that I completely misunderstood that!